The Relationship of Journalism to Democracy Essay

In a representative democratic system, news media – particularly print news media – is normally referred to as the Fourth Estate. It is a construct that sees the profession of news media as an independent establishment that protects public involvements and proctors the activities of authoritiess ( Miragliota, Errington and Barry 2011. pp. 6-7 ) . This construct was based on the premiss that powerful provinces must be prevented from mistreating their powers. Harmonizing to this construct, the media is considered to hold a cardinal function to play in the execution of representative democracy. Although, depending on one’s sentiment of the media, the function of media in the political argument has frequently been questioned and challenged. Some, like Julianne Schultz ( 1998, pp. 16-17 ) , argue that news media provides some kind of cheque and balance establishment to authoritiess and hence an of import facet of democracy. On the other manus, some such as Donohue, Tichenor and Olien ( 2006 ) believe that the ‘Fourth Estate’ construct is simply rationalization or a tool for the elite to protect their power alternatively of look intoing on their power.

In this paper I will foremost analyze the relationship between the pattern of news media and its relevancy to the manner representative political relations is conducted. Second I will measure the displacement in news media patterns from traditional signifiers ( print news media ) to new signifiers of news media such as the societal media and web logs. Then thirdly I will research whether or non these new signifiers of news media can carry through the traditional functions of news media and media in a democracy. By utilizing this model, I will reason that the pattern of news media is of import to the manner a representative democracy is conducted. I will besides do the point that the large displacement from traditional signifiers of news media ( print ) to its new digital signifier will still keep the traditional functions of news media and media in a democracy.

Is news media of import to democracy? Michael Schudson ( 2008 p. 12 ) argues that news media serves six maps in a democracy. These six maps are: “information, probe, analysis, societal empathy, public forum and mobilisation” ( Schudson, 2008 p. 12 ) . Furthermore, in Australia’s instance, Ward and Stewart ( 2009. p. 241 ) describe that the professional codification of Australian news media observes that in describing journalists should ‘inform citizens and animate democracy’ . The importance of the intelligence media as the Fourth Estate – educating, informing and supplying a forum for public treatment on the concern of administration – is underlined by Democratic theory. Looking at the above, it seems that news media does hold an of import function in democracy. It serves as a window for common citizens to organize and voice their sentiments, therefore as a conduit between authorities and electors. Active engagement from citizens is a demand in democracy as argued by Carpini ( 1996 ) . Voting in elections is one of many ways one can take part in democracy. However, if engagement stops abruptly at voting without farther involvement in province personal businesss so democracy could be threatened by deficiency of transparence and answerability. On the other manus, to vote sagely one needs to analyze the positions of each campaigner before doing the of import determination on whom to vote for. Therefore with this in head, the media should educate citizens with many facets of administration by circulating information and by moving as a medium where informed public treatment can be conducted.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

But has the relation between news media and democracy ever been smooth sailing? The relation between the two is best described as a love-hate relationship. Many times news media is used as a vehicle to falsify public sentiment on peculiar issues. The Cronulla public violence is an illustration of this phenomenon. This event shocked many Australians, including the New South Wales province authorities. A formal question that was established shortly afterwards to work through assorted histories of the incident found that wireless news media, such as talkback plans on commercial wireless, had played a function in arousing communities ( Turner, 2009. p. 412 ) . By circulating misdirecting information, these talkback plans had fed ‘public argument about ethnicity, faith and antisocial behavior taking up to the riot’ ( Lumby 2006 cited in Turner 2009 p. 412 ) . Alan Jones, a talkback host on Sydney AM station 2GB, was one outstanding figure investigated after formal ailments were made against Jones’ broadcast in during the period taking up to the Cronulla public violence ( Turner, 2009 p. 412 ) . Another probe conducted by the Australian Media and Communications Authority ( ACMA ) found that Jones had ‘breached theCommercial Radio Codes of Practice 2004( the codification ) by airing stuff that was probably to promote force or brutality’ ( ACMA, 2007 ) . In this kingdom, media has been subjected to unfavorable judgment for dramatizing and making hyperreality alternatively of describing incidents in an accurate and just mode ( Petersen, 2003. p. 251 ) . In add-on to this, there are besides intuitions about news media being excessively encapsulated in corporate involvements, as pointed out by Petley ( 2004 ) . He argues that corporations and huge private involvements are deriving more and more influence on the maps that used to be province personal businesss ( Petley, 2004. p. 5 ) . What this means for news media is that, non merely do journalists hold to voyage the state-originated censoring signifiers ( in Australia, censoring is called ‘classification’ and the board responsible is the Australian Classification Board ) but besides market-generated signifiers of censoring such as ‘the commodification of information, owner power, and the privileging of media investors over media audiences’ ( Petley, 2004. p. 5 ) .

On the other manus, news media has been an effectual vehicle in one of its aims – to further democracy by functioning as a watchdog to the activities of authoritiess. The demotion of Peter Garrett as Environment Minister after the failure of his controversial insularity strategy is an illustration of how news media can efficaciously function this map. After months of denying a nexus between the place insularity plan with house fires, amidst the public tumult in the media following the decease of a immature Australian ( in the terminal, there were four deceases reported ) and ‘over 100 house fires’ ( Hawke, 2010. p. 11 ) , the Australian Prime Minister at the clip, Kevin Rudd, demoted Peter Garrett as Environment Minister. Media examination over the now-botched strategy has arguably to some extent contributed to Peter Garrett’s demotion. Although there is no direct grounds that ministerial behavior is better or worse under media examination, instead I will reason that the media has a cardinal function in determining public sentiment on authorities activities. In other words, in-depth coverage of issues conducted by journalists helps determining attitudes of the public towards the activities of authoritiess. This basically means that the broad coverage on administration personal businesss by the Australian media acts as a medium for the populace to be informed and to discourse issues while seting force per unit area on the authorities to repair the muss. In this kingdom, the Australian media has arguably successfully served its map as a watchdog to the activities of authoritiess. Bennett and Serrin ( 2007 p. 327 cited in Hearns-Branaman, 2010 p. 5 ) lineation three chief elements of watchdog news media:

“ ( I ) independent examination by the imperativeness of the activities of authorities, concern and other public establishments, which aims toward ( two ) documenting, oppugning, and look intoing those activities, to ( iii ) supply public and functionaries with timely information on issues of public concern.”

Therefore watchdog news media, when done decently, goes beyond basic coverage and embraces a deeper degree of strength and thoroughness as argued by Marder ( 2001 ) . Based on the old statement, it can be said that intelligence serves as a span linking the public to policy-makers. When equity and truth are really implemented in coverage, this will further beef up the ideal of the profession of news media as the Fourth Estate and therefore news media will go on to be an indispensable facet in representative democracy.

The form of intelligence and media are invariably altering at an extraordinary rate. O’Donnell, McKnight and Este ( 2012. p. 4 ) argue that traditional news media has late become a intensifying crisis in Australia due to the turning of digital engineering. In Australia entirely, between 2007 – 2009, there was a diminution to the value of -3 % in the size of newspaper market and by contrast, the US experienced a diminution to the value of -30 % for the exact same period ( OECD, 2010 cited in O”Donnellet Al2012 p. 10 ) . What factors contribute to this phenomenon? One obvious cause is the rapid diminution of advertisement grosss. There has been a major displacement of advertisement gross off from newspapers to online media ( O’Donnellet Al2012 p. 11 ) . Todd Gitlin ( 2009 ) argues that there are 4 chief challenges that news media must get the better of. The first 1 is the major diminution in the circulation of newspapers. The 2nd is the rapid diminution in gross. The 3rd is the audience’s diffusion of attending and the 4th is crisis of authorization. The combination of all these 4 chief factors has arguably further eroded the sphere of newspaper news media which one time was the major medium for the populace to seek information.

However, does a displacement in form needfully intend the terminal of news media? In the following subdivision I will reason that the new signifiers of media ( on-line societal media such as Facebook, Twitter, sentiment web logs etc ) will be able to carry through the traditional functions of news media and media. Blogging has decidedly become a common characteristic in public life and media work ( Domingo and Heinonen, 2008 ; Rettberg, 2008 ; Rosenburg, 2009 cited in Lasorsa, Lewis and Holton, 2011. p. 2 ) . Meanwhile, microblogging media such as Twitter has besides gained prominence in circulating information to the multitudes. Its users encompass people from all walks of life, from journalists to politicians to famous persons, and include ordinary citizens. One celebrated use of Twitter and Facebook in circulating information is in the event of the Egyptian revolution ( Crovitz, 2011 ) . Social webs such as Facebook and Twitter provide the opportunity to its audience to be involved in minute-by-minute procedure of intelligence creative activity ( Lasorsaet Al2011. p. 4 ) . The chief intent of web logs is to enable ordinary citizens to voice their concern over whatever topics and/or issues they like. This will necessarily raise the inquiry, are the sentiments of ordinary citizens as voiced in their web logs less worthy than those of professional journalists? It is arguable that journalists are frequently better informed in their sentiment due to the nature of their profession. But with most ( if non all ) information available online ( this includes government’s media release ) , anyone who wants to accomplish sound fact-finding news media should experience spoilt by the options. The kernel of news media as the Fourth Estate will ever be maintained no affair what signifier of media it appears in, in so far as the independency and methodological analysis of news media are maintained. As argued by Coleman ( 1999, p. 21 ) “ [ The ] procedure of on-line information proviso, deliberation and audience will merely maturate when its procedural methodological analysis has been subjected to contemplation in the visible radiation of clearly stated democratic standards.”

Looking at the above treatment, it is clear that news media has a cardinal function in democracy in whatever signifier it presents itself in ; whether in a traditional medium such as the newspaper, or newer media such as web logs and societal media as elaborated in the old subdivision. Journalism in its ideal as the Fourth Estate protects public involvement while functioning as a watchdog to authoritiess and their personal businesss. Although it is of import to observe that that news media in itself does non bring forth democracy, news media can assist democracy to boom in so far as there is an environment that enables them to make so, as argued by Schudson ( 2008 p. 26 ) . The job with news media and democracy is that we as the populace do hold troubles in understanding the relation between the two. Part of this trouble can be attributed to the methodological analysis utilised in the coverage procedure and the other portion can be attributed to our deficiency of involvement in political world. It is besides of import non to confound intelligence with truths. News does non ever expose truths, and truths in consequence do non ever do it to the intelligence. This is where the chief aim of news media should lie, to educate the populace and enable them to to the full take part in democracy, therefore keeping the traditional function of news media in offering a equilibrating establishment to powers independent of authorities involvements.


Australian Media and Communications Authority. 2007.ACMA Media Release 35/2007 – 10 April[ online ] accessed 1 Oct 2012 & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ;

Carpini, M.1996. “ Best Democracy Requires Maximum Participation ” .The Salt Lake Tribune( 0746-3502 ) , p.A.11. [ on-line ] accessed 1 Oct 2012 & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ;

Coleman, S. 1999.Can the New Media Invigorate Democracy?The Political Quarterly, 70:16–22.doi:10.1111/1467-923X.00200 [ online ] accessed 2 Oct 2012 & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ;

Crovitz, L.G. 2011. Egypt’s Revolution by Social Media.Wall Street Journal[ online ] accessed 2 Oct 2012 & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ;

Donohue, G. A. , Tichenor, P. J. and Olien, C. N. 1995. A Guard Dog Perspective on the Role of Media.Journal of Communication, 45:115–132. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1995.tb00732.x [ online ] accessed 1 Oct 2012 & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ;

Gitlin, T. 2009. Journalism’s Many Crisiss.Open Democracy[ online ] accessed 2 Oct 2012. & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ;

Hawke, A. 2010.Reappraisal of the Administration of the Home Insulation ProgramAustralian Government, Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency [ online ] accessed 2 Oct 2012 & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ;

Hearns-Branaman, J.O. 2011.The Fourth Estate in the USA and UK: Discourses of Truth and Power.Doctorate thesis. The University of Leeds. [ on-line ] accessed 2 Oct 2012 & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ;

Lasorsa, D.L, Lewis, S.C, Holton, A.E. 2011. Normalizing ChirrupJournalism Studies ( London, England )( 1461-670X ) ,13 ( 1 ) , p. 1. Department of the interior: 10.1080/1461670X.2011.571825 [ on-line ] accessed 2 Oct 2012 & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ;

Marder, M. 2001. Press Failure to Watchdog Can Have Devastating Consequences.Nieman Reports.Particular Issue 2011. [ on-line ] accessed 2 Oct 2012 & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ;

Miragliota, N, Errington, W, Barry, N. 2011.The Australian Political System in ActionOxford University Press, Melbourne

O’Donnell, P, McKnight, D, Este, J. 2012.Journalism at the Speed of Bytes: Australian Newspapers in the 21stCentury.Australian Research Council and The Walkley Foundation [ online ] accessed 2 Oct 2012 & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ;

Petersen, J.H. 2003. “ Lippmann revisited: A remark 80 old ages subsequent to ‘Public Opinion ‘ ” . Journalism ( London, England ) ( 1464-8849 ) , 4 ( 2 ) , p. 249. Department of the interior: 10.1177/1464884903004002025 [ on-line ] viewed on 1 Oct 2012

& lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ;

Petley, J. 2004. “ Fourth-rate estate ” .Index on censoring ( 0306-4220 ) , 33 ( 2 ) ,p. 68. Department of the interior: 10.1080/03064220408537330 [ on-line ] accessed 2 Oct 2012

& lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // sid=98f73a8e-7327-4f41-a6f0-4d84e1868335 % 40sessionmgr11 & A ; vid=1 & A ; hid=14 & A ; bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZSZzY29wZT1zaXRl # db=ulh & A ; AN=13043221 & gt ;

Schudson, M. 2008.Why Democracies Need an Unlovable ImperativenessCambridge: Polity Press [ on-line ] viewed 1 Oct 2012 & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // id=Q2Dg55cxgfUC & A ; pg=PA11 & A ; source=gbs_toc_r & A ; cad=4 # v=onepage & A ; q & A ; f=false & gt ;

Schultz, J. 1998.Resuscitating the Fourth Estate.Cambridge University Press, Melbourne. ( pp. 15-20 )

Turner, G. 2009. Politicss, wireless and news media in Australia: The influence of ‘talkback ‘JournalismAugust 200910:411-430, DOI:10.1177/1464884909104948 [ online ] viewed 1 Oct 2012 & lt ; hypertext transfer protocol: // & gt ;

Ward, I, Stewart, R. 2009.Politicss One,4ThursdayEdition, Palgrave Macmillan, Sydney. ( pp. 237 – 46 )