Television A Positive Or Negatative Impact Essay

Television: A Positive Or Negatative Impact On Children Essay, Research Paper

Television: A posotive or negative impact on childrenTelevision: A positive or

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

negative impact on kids


Do kids larn from telecasting? Are some kids more drawn to telecasting

than others? Make babies and yearlings pay attending to and understand telecasting?

Which type of telecasting scheduling are most effectual with kids? Do the

behaviour in telecasting shows provide a theoretical account for the behaviour of a kid? Department of energies

advertisement on telecasting affect kids? Do kids obtain a & # 8220 ; release or

& # 8220 ; purging & # 8221 ; of their emotions from their vicarious engagement in telecasting

shows? Does the content of telecasting amusement affect a kid & # 8217 ; s construct

of his or her ain sex functions and his or her feelings toward his or her ethnicity?

Does it impact his or her construct of opposite sex functions? Which activities in

a kid & # 8217 ; s life are replaced by telecasting sing? Does watching a batch of

telecasting impact a kid & # 8217 ; s ability to read? Does it impact his or her

penchant for reading? Does it impact the sum of clip he or she normally

spends with books? How does telecasting sing tantrum into household life? Within the

household, who chooses the plans to be watched? Do kids accept the racial

stereotypes they see on telecasting? Do they accept the national and spiritual

stereotypes? Do kids in different socioeconomic positions typically have

different wonts of watching telecasting? Do intelligent kids differ from non

so bright kids in their usage of telecasting? Which techniques of telecasting

production addition kids & # 8217 ; s involvement and attentiveness? Can immature kids

ticker telecasting while at the same time prosecuting in activities non related to

telecasting? Do kids accept the stereotypes of businesss presented on

telecasting? ( Murray 1 )

These are merely some of the inquiries that research workers have tried to reply over

the old ages refering to kids and telecasting. In today & # 8217 ; s media age, it is no

surprise that people are going more and more concerned with how telecasting

can impact kids. Television is frequently referred to as the & # 8216 ; electronic

baby-sitter & # 8217 ; because it is frequently used to entertain kids when parents have

other things that they need to make. From my ain experiences and observations I

can state with great certainty that telecasting is going more and more a portion of

the lives of kids.

That is why I chose this subject for my thesis. It is of import that traveling into an

industry like airing I am cognizant that the things people take for granted

when seting shows on the air may hold a profound ( or non so profound ) impact on

person & # 8217 ; s life.

Television can hold a positive or negative impact on a kid. It all depends on

many different degrees of variables. These variables can include gender,

socioeconomic position, race, faith, age, hair colour, or anything else that may

do one individual different from another. For illustration, a miss with blond hair may

feel that she excessively may non be so bright after sing an episode of Married with

Children. This illustration, although a spot far-fetched, demonstrates the thought of how

kids & # 8217 ; s positions of themselves may be effected by telecasting. There are many

authoritative examples that people can utilize when seeking to reason that telecasting can

have a negative impact on kids. One illustration that I & # 8217 ; m certain most people are

familiar with is the instance in which a five-year-old Ohio male child set his dawdler place

on fire, killing his babe sister. His female parent instantly blamed the incident on

the alive MTV show Beavis and Butthead, a show that features two teenage male childs

prone to turns of pyromania. MTV argued that Beavis and Butthead come on late in

the eventide, normally after 10 PM. At that clip of dark, what the kid was

watching should hold been being monitored because most shows that are on that

tardily at dark are intended for more mature audiences.

That raises another antique inquiry. How much duty is to be placed on

the broadcasters and how much should be placed on the parents? Rightfully so, if

parents want their kids to watch educational shows on telecasting they should

be available. However, should broadcasters hold to restrict what they show on

telecasting because of kids?

As I did my research for this paper, I set out to happen research that proves that

telecasting can hold a positive consequence on kids. I did happen research to

substantiate this, which I will acquire into subsequently on in the paper, but first I want

to discourse why I chose to travel that path. I think that it is easy to fault

telecasting or, the media in general for the pestilences that ail society today. As a

immature adult female taking to travel into this field, I don & # 8217 ; t experience that this is

needfully the instance at all. I do believe that the media should take some

duty for what they show, but they are non wholly to fault for the

jobs in society.

Technology, Television and Society & # 8211 ; A brief sum-up of how telecasting ( and

other signifiers of mass media get integrated into society, and the consequence that they

cause )

Media is presented through assorted signifiers of engineering. As new engineering is

introduced, we as a society must either accommodate to it or we could stop up being

left buttocks. Harmonizing to media research worker Cecilia Tichi, new technological

promotions go through three phases of socialisation while being integrated

into our twenty-four hours to twenty-four hours lives. The three phases are:

1. Initiation

2. Naturalization

3. Defamiliarization

The debut of a new engineering medium is referred to as induction. This

is non an easy procedure as the huge bulk of people are immune to alter.

The new medium remains a enigma to many people until they are able to get the better of

their frights of it.

The debut of telecasting in the early mid-fortiess provided confusion and

apprehensiveness. Peoples were accustomed to hearing narratives on the wireless and now

all of a sudden they could visually watch them excessively. This was excessively much for many people

to digest. The fright of telecasting was non merely of what could be seen, but besides

of the existent set itself.

Something approximately holding this big box in their life room caused a sense

malaise. Much of the uneasy feelings which were felt, were signifiers of fright. Fear of

what function the telecasting would play in their lives, how it would impact their

household, what type of ethical motives would it learn, and precisely what it was. After all,

Television was known as the & # 8220 ; biggest window in the world. & # 8221 ;

Dumont attempted to get the better of these frights by making an advertisement company to

inform the populace and educate. This was all in effort to assist the people

understand the function telecasting could play in their lives.

Naturalization is the biggest phase in a medium & # 8217 ; s life. Once a medium is

integrated into our lives, this signifier of engineering becomes portion of the natural

order in our twenty-four hours to twenty-four hours activities. At this point the medium affects linguistic communication,

societal norms, and can even replace human interaction.

How can a technological medium impact our linguistic communication you say? We all can retrieve

the film & # 8220 ; Valley Girl, & # 8221 ; if non, possibly the more recent film & # 8220 ; Clueless. & # 8221 ; These

films encoded new phrases such as & # 8220 ; What-ever & # 8221 ; and & # 8220 ; As if! & # 8221 ; which were rapidly

integrated into twenty-four hours to twenty-four hours conversation, hence doing a alteration in our

linguistic communication and in human interaction.

Television affected societal norms. Television usher published a list of etiquette regulations

for unwanted invitees who stopped by to watch Television in the early to sixtiess.

Television besides created a whole new signifier of dining with Campbell & # 8217 ; s debut

of Television dinners in the 60 & # 8217 ; s. Alternatively of dinner at the dining room tabular array, people

began eating Television dinners on their glistening new Television trays right in forepart of the

telecasting. Television can wholly be used to replace human interaction. An illustration

of decreased human interaction that I mentioned earlier is when people allow

their telecasting to move as a baby-sitter for their kids. Barney ( as annoyance

as some grownups find him ) is now available to state night-time bedtime narratives to

kids by merely starting a tape into the VCR.

Once the medium has been of course integrated into our lives, there comes a clip

when we want more. We become world-weary with the same old shows, programming, histrions,

content and demand to see more. How do we do our demands? Well, several ways.

But chiefly by non tuning in. In response to these demands, formats are

invariably being changed, plans upgraded, and new attacks to the same

medium are being created. All of this happens to animate new involvement in the

medium, or for companies to maintain the advantage against rivals.

These three phases of interaction are invariably happening at different degrees

for all mediums. Economic position has the largest bearing on which phase a individual

is in. For illustration, the new HDTV ( High Definition Television ) . I & # 8217 ; m sure that

when the monetary value lessenings, as with most electronic or technologically advanced

points, the popularity of them will increase. People merely hold to be able to

afford them foremost.

Children, Television and Violence

Whenever the idea of how telecasting affects kids pops into person & # 8217 ; s

head, the first thing that they think about is the sum of force on

telecasting. Most aggregate communicating scientists, every bit good as most people in

general tend to experience that the more force a kid witnesses on telecasting, the

more aggressive he or she beco

Maines. Over 1000 surveies have been done to corroborate

this nexus.

Peoples believe that basically, media force legitimizes and contributes to a

civilization of force and the credence of force as an effectual solution to

jobs. The National Coalition on Television Violence have created media

force guidelines which describe violent Acts of the Apostless as those that involve an agent

and a victim, contain an look of open force, and are committed with

deliberate and hostile purpose. NCTV guidelines do non include accidents,

emotional shows, horseplay, slapstick, dainties, and athleticss activities as Acts of the Apostless

of force.

Accepting this definition of media force, it is said that by age 18, the

mean American kid will hold viewed about 200,000 Acts of the Apostless of force on

telecasting entirely. The degree of force during Saturday forenoon sketchs is

higher than the degree of force during premier clip. There are 3 to 5 violent

Acts of the Apostless per hr in premier clip, versus 20 to 25 Acts of the Apostless per hr on Saturday forenoon.

One of the major jobs with telecasting force, particularly in sketchs, is

that it fails to demo the effects of force. As a consequence, kids don & # 8217 ; T

larn the existent effects of force. Whether or non telecasting force

green goodss violent people is debatable. Media force, in my sentiment, can non be

said to hold a direct consequence on spectator actions. However, many people portion the

copiousness of force does hold an consequence on our mental good being. Such

messages reinforce beliefs that the universe is a violent and by and large insecure

topographic point, force is an effectual solution to jobs, and force is safe,

gratifying, glamourous, and once more, frequently have no evident effects.

Albert Bandura, a professor at Stanford University, did one of the first

experiments that dealt with seeking to turn out the relationship between force on

telecasting and aggression in kids. Bandura showed a cartridge holder of a adult male crushing a

& # 8220 ; bobo & # 8221 ; doll to a figure of kids. He so left the each kid entirely in a room

with a & # 8220 ; bobo & # 8221 ; doll. At one point the kids would get down to crush up the doll,

reenacting what they had saw being done in the cartridge holder.

A instance survey done by Aletha Huston-Stein and her co-workers assessed the effects

of sing both violent or nonviolent ( prosocial ) telecasting programming. In

this survey, about one hundred pre-school elderly kids enrolled in a baby’s room

school at Penn State University were divided into three groups and were assigned

to watch a peculiar diet of programming. The kids watched either a diet of

Batman and Superman sketchs, a diet of Mister Rogers & # 8217 ; Neighborhood, or a diet

of impersonal scheduling ( plans designed for pre-schoolers that contained

neither force nor prosocial messages ) .

Huston-Stein and her co-workers observed the childs on the resort area and in

the schoolroom for two hebdomads to measure the degree of aggressive and helpful

behavior displayed by the kids. Then the kids viewed the plan diet

one half hr a twenty-four hours, three yearss a hebdomad for four hebdomads. They watched 12

half-hour episodes of the diet to which they were assigned.

The researched found that the childs who watched the Batman and Superman

sketchs were more physically active, both in the schoolroom and on the

resort area. Besides, they were more likely to acquire into battles and statements with

each other, play approximately with playthings, interruption playthings, snatch playthings from others, and acquire

into small affraies. No mass slayings broke out, but they were merely more

aggressive and had more aggressive brushs. The other group that watched

Mister Rogers & # 8217 ; Neighborhood was much more likely to play hand in glove with

their playthings, spontaneously offer to assist the instructor, and prosecute in what might be

called & # 8220 ; positive equal reding & # 8221 ; . In this latter case, the focal point of Mister

Rogers & # 8217 ; Sessionss was similar to peer guidance. That is being sort, being

sensitive to others demands, and being concerned about others feelings. For

illustration, Fred Rogers might propose that if person looks sad, you could state,

& # 8220 ; Gee, you look sad today, are you experiencing okay? Do you desire to travel drama or make

something? & # 8221 ;

The group that watched the impersonal scheduling was neither more aggressive nor

more helpful. However, what is interesting about this survey is that it shows

both sides of the coin. What kids ticker does impact them, both positively,

as in the instance of the kids who watched Mister Rogers & # 8217 ; Neighborhood, and

negatively, as in the instance of the kids who watched the Batman and Superman

sketchs. ( Murray ) There is a broad scope of surveies similar to the Bandura and

Huston-Stein undertaking that addresses the short-run effects of kids sing


Children, Television and Literacy

One theory that interested me when it came to kids, telecasting and literacy

is the involvement stimulation theory. This theory looks at telecasting as a

positive thing in the lives of kids. Harmonizing to this theory, telecasting

introduces kids to new thoughts and subjects that they normally might non acquire

exposed to. In bend, if the presentation of the thought is done interestingly

enough it sparks the kid & # 8217 ; s involvement in the subject doing him or her to travel out

seeking more information about this.

Television & # 8217 ; s inducers and entertainers opened up new gateways of larning for

kids. No longer were they confined to their immediate environment. With

telecasting, many of the conceptual and logical barriers to widening kids & # 8217 ; s

experiences posed by other media were virtually swept off. Its very

handiness meant that kids were exposed to thoughts, events, and topographic points that

were one time reserved for grownups entirely.

The involvement stimulation theory proposes that telecasting can heighten acquisition by

exciting kids & # 8217 ; s involvements, hence making a hungriness for farther

information. For illustration, one time holding viewed a plan on a given subject,

kids will be more likely to expose a greater involvement in the schoolroom.

Similarly, they will read a book if they have seen the film or the telecasting

show based on it. This theory implicitly states that involvements lead to action.

In this regard, the benefits of telecasting are potentially double. By

exciting new involvements, immature viewing audiences will derive cognition and so seek to

obtain even further cognition on these same subjects.

Precisely what kinds of involvements does telecasting trip? Hope that telecasting

might excite kids to larn approximately subjects every bit unexpected as archaeology were

countered by the corresponding fright that they might be larning the incorrect sorts

of things. The involvement stimulation theory, hence, has undergone a instead

complex history. Initial research focused on the involvements and cognition gained

by the way through telecasting. Himmelweit, Oppenheim, and Vince ( 1958 ) , for

illustration, analyzed the extent to which telecasting stimulated kids to take up

new avocations and involvements. The 1970 & # 8217 ; s and early 1980 & # 8217 ; s, nevertheless saw an

unprecedented attempt to utilize telecasting deliberately as a powerful motivation

force to act upon the acquisition ends in the schools. Here, instructors were

encouraged to straight step in by associating kids & # 8217 ; s involvement in telecasting

and specific countries of school course of study such as societal surveies and linguistic communication humanistic disciplines.

( Literacy )

There have been many cases in which I have seen this theory put into

pattern. One such manner that I saw is called & # 8216 ; Cable in the Classroom & # 8217 ; . Although

it normally comes on at eldritch hours of the forenoon, pedagogues ( instructors,

rules, etc. ) are encouraged to tape these shows and demo them in the

schoolroom to trip involvement and treatment. The subjects of these plans can

scope from & # 8216 ; the dangers of drugs & # 8217 ; to the history of spiders & # 8217 ; .


Television as a medium is neither good nor bad ; its effects and value depend on

the types of plans broadcast and the ways in which they are used by viewing audiences.

Television screening is non inherently inactive. Children are frequently cognitively

active while they view ; they make picks about when and what to watch that

depend on their apprehension and involvements. However, in the early old ages,

kids & # 8217 ; s exposure to telecasting depends most significantly on their households. In

bend, household forms are partially governed by the societal establishments and

conditions in which they live. Again those variables like socioeconomic position

and merely the life environment are really pertinent to how telecasting can impact


The early old ages are a critical clip for the socialisation of telecasting screening

wonts. Children learn about what to watch and how much to watch through the

illustration set by parents. Much of their exposure to grownup plans is a direct

consequence of sing picks made by others in their households. Parents who are

selective or restrictive influence their kids & # 8217 ; s sing forms, but their

ain screening besides serves as a powerful theoretical account for their kids. Although

households are important go-betweens of their kids & # 8217 ; s exposure to telecasting, their

picks are constrained by determinations in the broadcast medium industry about what to

green goods and broadcast and by the clip demands of occupations and schools. If

telecasting is to go a more positive force for kids & # 8217 ; s development, the

industry has a duty for providing varied, well-designed, originative

programming instead than To see the remainder of this essay you must be a screwschool

member chink here to go a member.