Reason and perceptual experience are two chief methods which we use in our unrecorded really different from each other. Reason is the manner we obtain cognition by agencies of our justifications and perceptual experience is the manner we obtain cognition by our experiences. This two methods are non perfect are in portion right mom non ever. In my sentiment. nevertheless I think that ground is a more dependable method for deriving cognition.
This is merely because when doing a determination based on ground you have to cover with at least two different facts with coming up with the concluding decision. While with perceptual experience everything you see may look like this. but in life we learn that isn’t ever like this and you can come out with merely a small portion of the information that you could hold with the usage of ground. You can’t trust things or people you have non identified. However although this two methods are different they have besides some similiarities.
Reason and perceptual experience are two immensely different ways of cognizing nevertheless they both have similarities in their strengths and restrictions. Reason is viewed as the ultimate beginning of cognizing by positivists as it involves logic as in stating that two plus three will ever be five and nil else. Reason can be misdirecting as assorted signifiers of cognition including perceptual experience struggle with the ideal behind rationalism as a manner of knowing.
Percept has a major strength as a manner of cognizing because we can physically see the emotion and the happening. This manner of knowing is known as Empiricism. Empiricists argue that the ultimate beginning of cognition is experience. However this to has its ain bounds because the inquiry “how do you cognize that that really happened? ” can be asked.
In Conclusion. ground and perceptual experience are dependent one on the other.