College athletes are thought of to be the most advantageous students in a college, Most of the time they’re given a scholarship that pays for all the costs of school, plus, they are in a great position to make a name for themselves in the sporting world and prepare for the big leagues. The idea of paying college athletes has even captivated famous non-athletes including Jay Bilas of ESPN. However it first started as a question about players in video games, it has developed into an argument about payment in general. While this issue certainly isn’t new, it is now become intensified in recent decades and the past few years. College athletes should be paid to perform for their university considering the substantial revenue they make for the college and the immense amounts of work they put in towards the sport. in order to be treated fairly for their contribution of hard work and funding they provide for the NCAA and university. If someone buys another person a gift putting in lots of hard work wrapping it and spending the money on the present, it is expected that the person buying a gift will be the recipient of a well made thank you note. This theory can be related to the idea of paying college athletes back for the money they make for the university and the hard work they put in. The time commitments and revenues, that millions of other student athletes play with can all be comparable to those found on a professional level. However, there are just as many athletes who do not play with these similarities. Obviously not all student athletes qualify as professionals, but if they do, why can’t we pay them? student athletes should be monetarily compensated for their work. However, these student athletes must fit into specific categories regarding revenues and time commitments, since the criteria is straight statistics, it should be relatively easy for the NCAA or university to divide the money accordingly.